Videos
Learn More About Alta Charo
Biotechnology offers us vast opportunities to improve many aspects of life, from expanding our food supply, constructing smart buildings and creating sustainable products to curing diseases and helping living beings adapt to changing climates. While such possibilities evoke a sense of hope and excitement, ethical considerations around genome editing must be carefully considered, says acclaimed bioethicist, futurist and legal scholar Alta Charo. Professor Emerita of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, Charo helps organizations understand the complex legal, ethical and regulatory issues surrounding biotechnology and emerging sciences.
Lead co-chair at BioMade and co-chair of the National Academy of Medicine Committee on Emerging Science, Technology and Innovation, Charo has been advising multinational organizations and governments for decades, helping them establish ethical guidelines in such areas as reproductive technologies, vaccines, pharmaceutical development, public health, food engineering, sustainability and stem cell research. In March 2021, she concluded a fellowship focused on global biosecurity at the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
A brilliant and engaging orator, Charo is unbiased, practical and constructive when addressing arguments both for and against often-controversial DNA altering processes like CRISPR.
“Human genome editing holds tremendous promise for understanding, treating or preventing many devastating genetic diseases, and for improving treatment of many other illnesses,” said Charo when commenting on a National Academy of Medicine report on genome editing. “However, genome editing to enhance traits or abilities beyond ordinary health raises concerns about whether the benefits can outweigh the risks, and about fairness if [the technology is] available only to some people.”
As a policy and legal advisor to the U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, the Office of the Commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration and the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Charo has served as a bridge between groups of scientists, business leaders and politicians with divergent views, helping them find a way forward that’s responsible and beneficial. Her expertise and insights are relevant to decision makers in a variety of sectors: she helps law firms understand novel legal issues around biotechnology; brings investment advisors up to speed on companies developing emerging technologies; discusses the ethical issues of clinical trials and drug access with pharmaceutical firms; consults on the medical and environmental applications of gene therapy and genome editing; and enlightens companies on options for shifting to sustainable business models.
Charo’s passion for finding the sweet spot between creative innovation and socially responsible applications has earned her the respect of peers and organizational leaders around the world. She sits on several important advisory boards and committees and was elected to the National Academy of Medicine, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. That stellar reputation also led to her being featured in the NOVA documentary “Human Nature.”
“I began my career with a desire to combine science with social activism,” says Charo, who considers herself a techno-optimist. “My job is to help companies understand the ripple effects of their decisions on society and point them toward responsible practices.”
# # #
Alta Charo served on President Clinton’s National Bioethics Advisory Commission, which wrote reports on cloning, embryo research and protection of human subjects in research trials. She is or has been a member of many boards and committees of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, where she focused on topics ranging from pharmaceutical development to vaccine safety and, more recently, Covid-19 vaccine allocation. At the Academies, she co-chaired the committees that developed national guidelines for both stem cell research and human genome editing. Currently she co-chairs its committee on governance frameworks for emerging science and technology innovation. She also served on the World Health Organization expert committee that developed a framework for global governance of genome editing and was on the organizing committee for the March 2022 international genome editing summit.
In government, Charo served as a senior policy advisor to the Commissioner at the FDA, where she worked on policies governing drug safety, diagnostic testing, and genetically engineered foods and animals.
Charo has authored or contributed to more than 150 articles, book chapters and government reports on life sciences law and policy, and taught courses on biotechnology regulatory policy; pharmaceutical and cell therapy development; clinical research design and ethics; reproductive rights; medical ethics; and public health law. She holds an AB in biology from Harvard University and a law degree from Columbia University. She has been a Berggruen Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, a Fulbright Lecturer in American Law at the Sorbonne in Paris and a Diplomacy Fellow at U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
Alta Charo is available to advise your organization via virtual and in-person consulting meetings, interactive workshops and customized keynotes through the exclusive representation of Stern Speakers & Advisors, a division of Stern Strategy Group®.
Photo credit: Jeff Miller, University of Wisconsin
The Ethics of New Science: Extracting the Benefits While Mitigating the Harm
While revolutionary advances in biotechnology seek to solve problems, some promising innovations present us with ethical dilemmas, from how to responsibly pursue stem cell research to deciding how we should regulate gene editing. As society grapples with decisions around vaccine mandates, health care accessibility, and the need to cure chronic diseases, genetic engineering is at the forefront of policy discussions. For decades, acclaimed bioethicist, futurist and legal scholar Alta Charo has been helping organizations – including the U.S. government, multinational companies, and global entities such as the World Health Organization – examine complex legal, ethical and regulatory issues surrounding biotechnology and emerging sciences. A dynamic storyteller, Charo shares case studies and deep insights into what we must consider when making decisions around new technologies so we can extract the many benefits offered by scientific breakthroughs without harming society.
Lessons from Past Pandemics: Examining the Legal, Ethical and Public Health Issues Surrounding Quarantines and Mandates
Disease control through quarantines, lockdowns and vaccine mandates dates back centuries, yet the flash points around the role of the government, the powers of employers, and the rights of individuals have endured. Predictably, as in the past, controversial issues related to race, ethnicity, education, religion and wealth are again intensifying during the current COVID-19 pandemic. In this talk, acclaimed bioethicist, futurist, and legal scholar Alta Charo discusses the history of pandemic responses and the current legal situation with respect to voluntary measures and mandates. Drawing on lessons from the past, she outlines practical ways leaders can build trust, protect their own interests as well as those of their employees, and explains what needs to be done to reduce the overall threat to public health.
Biotechnology’s Impact on Our Future
Advances in biotechnology are affecting many areas of life, from genetic therapies and pharmaceutical development to sustainable construction, agriculture and biosecurity. Helping us understand this rapidly growing area of science is acclaimed bioethicist, futurist and legal scholar Alta Charo, Professor Emerita of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin. In this presentation, Professor Charo highlights current and emerging advances in biotechnology, explores related ethical considerations and explains how we can make responsible decisions around integrating them into society so we can protect our future.
Our Green Future: Biotech’s Sustainable Solutions
Imagine buildings constructed with “smart skins” that adapt to the prevailing climate, or parks with fluorescent grass that eliminate the need for streetlights. For decades, acclaimed bioethicist, futurist and legal scholar Alta Charo, Professor Emerita of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, has been advising multinational organizations, governments and professional societies on the legal and ethical implications of advances in biotechnology, as well as the possibilities. In this presentation, Professor Charo – a self-described techno-optimist – discusses exciting new developments in emerging technologies that offer businesses and governments myriad ways to positively serve society and build a sustainable future.
Alta Charo Considers Ethics for Stem Cells and CRISPR (Audio)
February 13, 2024
Women In Tech: Closing The Gap, One Byte At A Time
February 9, 2023
The Ethics of Gene Editing (Video)
July 7, 2021
Alta Charo Podcast Intervoew (Audio)
October 9, 2020
What's Next For for Genome Editing Governance (Audio)
August 26, 2020
Bioethics and the Law (Audio)
September 17, 2018
Bioethics of Fetal Tissue Research (Video)
March 2, 2016
The Case of Embryonic Stem Cell Research
May 28, 2015
University Place: Bioethics (Video)
June 17, 2009
An Interview with Professor Alta Charo
Spring 2005
Legislative Approaches to Surrogate Motherhood
(Cambridge University Press, April 2021)
Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing
(The New England Journal of Medicine, March 2019)
Rejuvenating Regenerative Medicine Regulation
(The New England Journal of Medicine, February 2018)
Yellow Lights For Emerging Technologies
(American Association for the Advancement of Science, July 2015)
A Prudent Path Forward For Genomic Engineering And Germline Gene Modification
(American Association for the Advancement of Science, April 2015)
CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks
(American Journal of Bioethics, December 2015)
The Societal Opportunities And Challenges Of Genome Editing
(Genome Biology, November 2015)
The Partial Death of Abortion Rights
(The New England Journal of Medicine, May 2007)
Politics, Parents, and Prophylaxis — Mandating HPV Vaccination in the United States
(The New England Journal of Medicine, May 2007)
Body of Research — Ownership and Use of Human Tissue
(The New England Journal of Medicine, October 2006)
The Celestial Fire of Conscience — Refusing to Deliver Medical Care
(The New England Journal of Medicine, June 2005)
The Ethics of Control
(Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 2002)